Energy transition from brown to green — Sembcorp targets 25 GW gross renewable capacity by 2028 and a GHG emissions intensity of 0.15 tCO2e/MWh by 2028 (from 0.40 in 2010). Three material factors: Climate Action, Empowering Lives, Resilient Business.
Temasek Portfolio, side by side.
Environmental, social, and governance data sourced directly from the latest published reports of Sembcorp Industries (FY2025), SMRT Corporation (FY2024/25), and Singtel Group (FY2025). Every figure is verified against source. N/D = not disclosed in official report.
01 — Snapshot
Portfolio facts — comparable & contextual02 — Emissions & ESG
All emissions in ktCO₂e (thousands of tonnes)Bar opacity denotes scope (solid = Scope 1). On a log scale every bar is visible; switch to linear to see Sembcorp's true energy-utility dominance.
Sembcorp Scope 3 (15.3M tCO₂e) includes Category 15 Investments — a common energy-company convention that inflates Scope 3 relative to telecom and grid peers. Use the Excl. Category 15 toggle to remove it where a company discloses the breakdown. Scope 2 is market-based throughout.
03 — Comparison Matrix
Metric by metric, across the three reports| Metric | Sembcorp Energy · FY2025 | SMRT Transport · FY2024/25 | Singtel Telecom · FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental | |||
Scope 1 Emissions Direct GHG | |||
Scope 2 Emissions Market-based | |||
Scope 3 Emissions Indirect GHG | |||
Scope 3 — Cat 15 Investments (of which) | |||
GHG Intensity different units — not comparable | |||
Renewable Capacity GW installed | |||
Renewable Energy % % of electricity | |||
Net-Zero Target Year (Scope 1+2) | |||
S1+S2 Reduction vs. baseline year | |||
Water Consumption Potable (m³) | |||
| Social | |||
Training Hrs/Employee Per year | |||
Female Board % Board diversity | |||
Female Leadership % Senior mgmt | |||
Total Headcount Employees | |||
Employee Engagement Score / % | |||
Injury Rate (LTIR) Per million hrs | |||
Community Investment SGD millions | |||
| Governance | |||
Independent Directors % of board | |||
Anti-Corruption Training % employees trained | |||
| Governance — Qualitative | |||
External Assurance Third-party verified | DNV | None | EY |
ESG-Linked Exec. Pay Compensation tied to ESG | Yes | N/D | Yes |
Reporting Frameworks Standards adopted | GRIIFRS S2SGX Core ESG | GRIIFRS S2UN SDGs | GRITCFDIFRS S2SASB |
GHG intensity units differ by sector — not comparable
Badges appear only for metrics comparable across sectors (board diversity, training hours, external assurance, renewable-energy share). Absolute emissions, intensities on different denominators, and sector-specific safety metrics carry no badge. See methodology.
04 — Company Profiles
Strategy & headline figuresSingapore's multi-modal public transport operator (rail, bus, taxi). Decarbonisation focus: traction-energy efficiency, cleaner bus/taxi fleet, and exploring renewable energy procurement, aligned with Singapore's net-zero-by-2050 goal.
Singtel 4D Environmental Strategy — Defend, Decarbonise, Dematerialise, Deliver. SBTi-validated targets: reduce Scope 1+2 by 55% and Scope 3 by 40% by FY2030 vs FY2023 baseline. Net-zero across all scopes by FY2045 (advanced from 2050 in FY2024).
05 — Methodology
How to read this comparisonNo value is inferred
Every figure is taken directly from a company's own latest published report and carries a citation (hover or tap the dotted value). Nothing is estimated, interpolated, or filled: a metric that a report does not disclose is shown as N/D — never zero, never a computed substitute. Charts break the line at a missing year rather than drawing through it.
Comparability & badges
A green “best performer” badge appears only for metrics that are genuinely comparable across these sectors — board diversity, training hours, external assurance, and renewable-energy share. Absolute emissions, GHG intensities (which use different denominators per sector), and sector-specific safety metrics are shown but never badged, because a cross-sector “winner” there would be misleading. Combined portfolio totals are marked context-only and excluded from export.
Cross-sector aggregation — not a comparable figure. Summing absolute emissions across an energy generator, a transit operator, and a telecom mixes fundamentally different footprints. Shown for context; excluded from CSV/JSON export.
06 — Sources & Caveats
Where every figure comes fromThese companies span different sectors (energy, transport, telecom) and fiscal years (Sembcorp Jan–Dec; SMRT & Singtel Apr–Mar) — figures are not from the same calendar period.
Emissions are not comparable across sectors: Sembcorp is an energy generator (utility scale); SMRT is a mass-transit operator; Singtel is a telecom provider.
Sembcorp Scope 3 (15.3M tCO₂e) includes Category 15 Investments — a convention that significantly inflates Scope 3 relative to transport/telecom peers.
Singtel FY2025 Scope 1 rose ~57% YoY due to an expansion of reporting scope (Global Offices + NCS), not an actual increase in emissions.
SMRT's largest source is Scope 2 traction electricity (>50% of total); emissions have risen with network expansion, so no reduction-vs-baseline is shown (target: −20% vs 2022 by 2030).
SMRT reports its injury rate per 100,000 employees, a different basis from the per-million-hours LTIR used by the others — shown as N/D to avoid a misleading comparison.
GHG-intensity units differ by sector (per-MWh, per-revenue, per-TB) and are not comparable.
N/D (not disclosed) means the metric was not found in the official published report or could not be confirmed from extracted data.